Comments on: 3.1 — Precedence and associativity http://www.learncpp.com/cpp-tutorial/31-precedence-and-associativity/ Tue, 07 Feb 2012 12:30:29 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: kapa_89 http://www.learncpp.com/cpp-tutorial/31-precedence-and-associativity/comment-page-1/#comment-94844 kapa_89 Mon, 01 Nov 2010 00:23:43 +0000 http://www.learncpp.com/cpp-tutorial/31-precedence-and-associativity/#comment-94844 [code]czo5OlwiNCArIDIgKiAzXCI7e1smKiZdfQ==[/code] czo5OlwiNCArIDIgKiAzXCI7e1smKiZdfQ== ]]> By: dospy http://www.learncpp.com/cpp-tutorial/31-precedence-and-associativity/comment-page-1/#comment-90415 dospy Mon, 16 Aug 2010 22:08:50 +0000 http://www.learncpp.com/cpp-tutorial/31-precedence-and-associativity/#comment-90415 <pre> 4 L->R ->* Member pointer selector pObject->*pnValue = 24; .* Member object selector cObject->.*pnValue = 24; </pre> shouldn't the above code be: <pre> 4 L->R ->* Member pointer selector pObject->*pnValue = 24; .* Member object selector cObject.*pnValue = 24; </pre> ??? if i am wrong explain to me please btw, thanks for so good tutorials really understandable since you use clear (and many) examples 4 L->R ->* Member pointer selector pObject->*pnValue = 24; .* Member object selector cObject->.*pnValue = 24;

shouldn’t the above code be:

4 L->R	 ->*    Member pointer selector    pObject->*pnValue = 24;
          .*	Member object selector     cObject.*pnValue = 24;

???

if i am wrong explain to me please

btw, thanks for so good tutorials
really understandable since you use clear (and many) examples

]]> By: John http://www.learncpp.com/cpp-tutorial/31-precedence-and-associativity/comment-page-1/#comment-82652 John Sat, 10 Apr 2010 11:58:38 +0000 http://www.learncpp.com/cpp-tutorial/31-precedence-and-associativity/#comment-82652 just a suggestion; if you could make the chart in to an image file as well so people could save it and pull it up at any time it might be easier for referencing in the future. just a suggestion; if you could make the chart in to an image file as well so people could save it and pull it up at any time it might be easier for referencing in the future.

]]> By: Ole http://www.learncpp.com/cpp-tutorial/31-precedence-and-associativity/comment-page-1/#comment-75431 Ole Sun, 03 Jan 2010 18:07:34 +0000 http://www.learncpp.com/cpp-tutorial/31-precedence-and-associativity/#comment-75431 Just a suggestion towards readability and clarity. The R->L and L->R could maybe be changed into R -> L and R <- L ? Just a suggestion towards readability and clarity. The R->L and L->R could maybe be changed into R -> L and R <- L ?

]]> By: Fluke http://www.learncpp.com/cpp-tutorial/31-precedence-and-associativity/comment-page-1/#comment-73134 Fluke Fri, 27 Nov 2009 11:58:54 +0000 http://www.learncpp.com/cpp-tutorial/31-precedence-and-associativity/#comment-73134 Is it a mistake that &=, |= and ^= are Logical AND, OR, XOR assignments, or they are bitwise? Is it a mistake that &=, |= and ^= are Logical AND, OR, XOR assignments, or they are bitwise?

]]> By: Extremo http://www.learncpp.com/cpp-tutorial/31-precedence-and-associativity/comment-page-1/#comment-62753 Extremo Sat, 20 Jun 2009 20:31:03 +0000 http://www.learncpp.com/cpp-tutorial/31-precedence-and-associativity/#comment-62753 Well, you've had a typo fault in here: nValue = +5;M You've accidently pressed the M there, as its right next to the semicolon. Just wanted to add that so you can fix it before people will encounter problems here. Regards, Extremo. Well, you’ve had a typo fault in here:

nValue = +5;M

You’ve accidently pressed the M there, as its right next to the semicolon. Just wanted to add that so you can fix it before people will encounter problems here.

Regards,
Extremo.

]]> By: Alex http://www.learncpp.com/cpp-tutorial/31-precedence-and-associativity/comment-page-1/#comment-30965 Alex Sat, 25 Oct 2008 18:17:27 +0000 http://www.learncpp.com/cpp-tutorial/31-precedence-and-associativity/#comment-30965 I removed the paragraph that referenced logical AND and logical OR because it was confusing to introduce it at this point without an explanation of what those operators are. That information is covered again later in lesson 3.6. You won't be handicapped by not understanding what the majority of the operators are. They'll all be explained as needed. Just keep reading. :) I removed the paragraph that referenced logical AND and logical OR because it was confusing to introduce it at this point without an explanation of what those operators are. That information is covered again later in lesson 3.6.

You won’t be handicapped by not understanding what the majority of the operators are. They’ll all be explained as needed. Just keep reading. :)

]]> By: fdsafdas http://www.learncpp.com/cpp-tutorial/31-precedence-and-associativity/comment-page-1/#comment-30802 fdsafdas Fri, 24 Oct 2008 02:31:29 +0000 http://www.learncpp.com/cpp-tutorial/31-precedence-and-associativity/#comment-30802 Go to google and type them in and they'll probably explain it to you Go to google and type them in and they’ll probably explain it to you

]]> By: NewP http://www.learncpp.com/cpp-tutorial/31-precedence-and-associativity/comment-page-1/#comment-30578 NewP Wed, 22 Oct 2008 13:37:42 +0000 http://www.learncpp.com/cpp-tutorial/31-precedence-and-associativity/#comment-30578 Sorry, couldn't find how to edit my previous post, I was also wondering what all the logical and what a bitwise shift is. Sorry if these questions are dumb but I want to fully understand each section before I move on incase it handicaps me later on. Thanks Sorry, couldn’t find how to edit my previous post, I was also wondering what all the logical and what a bitwise shift is. Sorry if these questions are dumb but I want to fully understand each section before I move on incase it handicaps me later on.

Thanks

]]> By: NewP http://www.learncpp.com/cpp-tutorial/31-precedence-and-associativity/comment-page-1/#comment-30577 NewP Wed, 22 Oct 2008 13:28:37 +0000 http://www.learncpp.com/cpp-tutorial/31-precedence-and-associativity/#comment-30577 Call me a newb at this but I have no idea what Logical AND and Logical OR are. i.e what would this mean? <pre>(bValue1 && bValue2) || bValue3</pre> Call me a newb at this but I have no idea what Logical AND and Logical OR are.

i.e what would this mean?

(bValue1 && bValue2) || bValue3
]]>