Comments on: 5.7 — For statements http://www.learncpp.com/cpp-tutorial/57-for-statements/ Wed, 20 Aug 2008 09:10:20 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1 By: blas januar http://www.learncpp.com/cpp-tutorial/57-for-statements/#comment-22831 blas januar Tue, 05 Aug 2008 11:22:19 +0000 http://www.learncpp.com/cpp-tutorial/57-for-statements/#comment-22831 nice one poe. . . sana magbigay kapa ng mas maraming example pra mapadali ung assign q. . hhahaha sayang kasi para d2 nalang aq naghanap. . . but tnx nadin poe.. . nice one poe. . . sana magbigay kapa ng mas maraming example pra mapadali ung assign q. . hhahaha sayang kasi para d2 nalang aq naghanap. . . but tnx nadin poe.. .

]]> By: Daniel http://www.learncpp.com/cpp-tutorial/57-for-statements/#comment-15210 Daniel Fri, 09 May 2008 08:57:05 +0000 http://www.learncpp.com/cpp-tutorial/57-for-statements/#comment-15210 <pre>for (int iii=0; iii < 10; jjj++) ; </pre>Shouldn't that be this. <pre>for (int iii=0; iii < 10; iii++, jjj++) ; </pre>Great tutorials by the way. [ I changed the example slightly because it was incorrect, as you noticed. Thanks! -Alex ] for (int iii=0; iii < 10; jjj++) ;

Shouldn’t that be this.

for (int iii=0; iii < 10; iii++, jjj++)
    ;

Great tutorials by the way.

[ I changed the example slightly because it was incorrect, as you noticed. Thanks! -Alex ]

]]> By: Learn C++ - » 5.6 — Do while statements http://www.learncpp.com/cpp-tutorial/57-for-statements/#comment-13469 Learn C++ - » 5.6 — Do while statements Tue, 29 Apr 2008 04:48:32 +0000 http://www.learncpp.com/cpp-tutorial/57-for-statements/#comment-13469 [...] 2007 Prev/Next Posts « Six language-independent ways to write better code | Home | 5.7 — For statements » Monday, June 25th, 2007 at 4:54 [...] [...] 2007 Prev/Next Posts « Six language-independent ways to write better code | Home | 5.7 — For statements » Monday, June 25th, 2007 at 4:54 [...]

]]> By: abhishek raj http://www.learncpp.com/cpp-tutorial/57-for-statements/#comment-9888 abhishek raj Mon, 17 Mar 2008 23:55:35 +0000 http://www.learncpp.com/cpp-tutorial/57-for-statements/#comment-9888 hey !!!!!!!! Thanx a lot... I read particularly this page and found it too diverse n interesting... u people should also try this once. keep enjoying,........ hey !!!!!!!!
Thanx a lot…
I read particularly this page and found it too diverse n interesting…
u people should also try this once.

keep enjoying,……..

]]> By: Jamal http://www.learncpp.com/cpp-tutorial/57-for-statements/#comment-9697 Jamal Sun, 16 Mar 2008 20:47:58 +0000 http://www.learncpp.com/cpp-tutorial/57-for-statements/#comment-9697 Thanks a lot for your help. Thanks a lot for your help.

]]> By: Alex http://www.learncpp.com/cpp-tutorial/57-for-statements/#comment-9542 Alex Thu, 13 Mar 2008 21:09:43 +0000 http://www.learncpp.com/cpp-tutorial/57-for-statements/#comment-9542 <pre> nSum += iii </pre> is just a shortcut for writing: <pre> nSum = nSum + iii; </pre> In other words, increase nSum by iii. nSum += iii

is just a shortcut for writing:

nSum = nSum + iii;

In other words, increase nSum by iii.

]]> By: John http://www.learncpp.com/cpp-tutorial/57-for-statements/#comment-9526 John Thu, 13 Mar 2008 16:08:40 +0000 http://www.learncpp.com/cpp-tutorial/57-for-statements/#comment-9526 Hi; Can you explain quiz example.? I don't understand the purpose of "nSum += iii;" statement. Particulary nSum +=. What it will do exactley. Thanks int SumTo(int nSumTo) { int nSum = 0; for (int iii=1; iii Hi;

Can you explain quiz example.? I don’t understand the purpose of “nSum += iii;” statement. Particulary nSum +=.
What it will do exactley.
Thanks

int SumTo(int nSumTo)
{
int nSum = 0;
for (int iii=1; iii

]]> By: Niall the don http://www.learncpp.com/cpp-tutorial/57-for-statements/#comment-2496 Niall the don Tue, 06 Nov 2007 19:58:34 +0000 http://www.learncpp.com/cpp-tutorial/57-for-statements/#comment-2496 Hello I think in your second solution nValue should be nSumTo [Yup! Thanks for noticing the mistake. -Alex ] Hello
I think in your second solution nValue should be nSumTo

[Yup! Thanks for noticing the mistake. -Alex ]

]]>