In the previous lessons in this chapter, you’ve learned a bit about how base inheritance works. In all of our examples so far, we’ve used public inheritance. That is, our derived class publicly inherits the base class.
In this lesson, we’ll take a closer look at public inheritance, as well as the two other kinds of inheritance (private and protected). We’ll also explore how the different kinds of inheritance interact with access specifiers to allow or restrict access to members.
To this point, you’ve seen the private and public access specifiers, which determine who can access the members of a class. As a quick refresher, public members can be accessed by anybody. Private members can only be accessed by member functions of the same class or friends. This means derived classes can not access private members of the base class directly!
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 |
class Base { private: int m_private; // can only be accessed by Base members and friends (not derived classes) public: int m_public; // can be accessed by anybody }; |
This is pretty straightforward, and you should be quite used to it by now.
The protected access specifier
When dealing with inherited classes, things get a bit more complex.
C++ has a third access specifier that we have yet to talk about because it’s only useful in an inheritance context. The protected access specifier allows the class the member belongs to, friends, and derived classes to access the member. However, protected members are not accessible from outside the class.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 |
class Base { public: int m_public; // can be accessed by anybody protected: int m_protected; // can be accessed by Base members, friends, and derived classes private: int m_private; // can only be accessed by Base members and friends (but not derived classes) }; class Derived: public Base { public: Derived() { m_public = 1; // allowed: can access public base members from derived class m_protected = 2; // allowed: can access protected base members from derived class m_private = 3; // not allowed: can not access private base members from derived class } }; int main() { Base base; base.m_public = 1; // allowed: can access public members from outside class base.m_protected = 2; // not allowed: can not access protected members from outside class base.m_private = 3; // not allowed: can not access private members from outside class } |
In the above example, you can see that the protected base member m_protected is directly accessible by the derived class, but not by the public.
So when should I use the protected access specifier?
With a protected attribute in a base class, derived classes can access that member directly. This means that if you later change anything about that protected attribute (the type, what the value means, etc…), you’ll probably need to change both the base class AND all of the derived classes.
Therefore, using the protected access specifier is most useful when you (or your team) are going to be the ones deriving from your own classes, and the number of derived classes is reasonable. That way, if you make a change to the implementation of the base class, and updates to the derived classes are necessary as a result, you can make the updates yourself (and have it not take forever, since the number of derived classes is limited).
Making your members private gives you better encapsulation and insulates derived classes from changes to the base class. But there’s also a cost to build a public or protected interface to support all the access methods or capabilities that the public and/or derived classes need. That’s additional work that’s probably not worth it, unless you expect someone else to be the one deriving from your class, or you have a huge number of derived classes, where the cost of updating them all would be expensive.
Different kinds of inheritance, and their impact on access
First, there are three different ways for classes to inherit from other classes: public, protected, and private.
To do so, simply specify which type of access you want when choosing the class to inherit from:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 |
// Inherit from Base publicly class Pub: public Base { }; // Inherit from Base protectedly class Pro: protected Base { }; // Inherit from Base privately class Pri: private Base { }; class Def: Base // Defaults to private inheritance { }; |
If you do not choose an inheritance type, C++ defaults to private inheritance (just like members default to private access if you do not specify otherwise).
That gives us 9 combinations: 3 member access specifiers (public, private, and protected), and 3 inheritance types (public, private, and protected).
So what’s the difference between these? In a nutshell, when members are inherited, the access specifier for an inherited member may be changed (in the derived class only) depending on the type of inheritance used. Put another way, members that were public or protected in the base class may change access specifiers in the derived class.
This might seem a little confusing, but it’s not that bad. We’ll spend the rest of this lesson exploring this in detail.
Keep in mind the following rules as we step through the examples:
- A class can always access its own (non-inherited) members.
- The public accesses the members of a class based on the access specifiers of the class it is accessing.
- A derived class accesses inherited members based on the access specifier inherited from the parent class. This varies depending on the access specifier and type of inheritance used.
Public inheritance
Public inheritance is by far the most commonly used type of inheritance. In fact, very rarely will you see or use the other types of inheritance, so your primary focus should be on understanding this section. Fortunately, public inheritance is also the easiest to understand. When you inherit a base class publicly, inherited public members stay public, and inherited protected members stay protected. Inherited private members, which were inaccessible because they were private in the base class, stay inaccessible.
Access specifier in base class | Access specifier when inherited publicly |
---|---|
Public | Public |
Protected | Protected |
Private | Inaccessible |
Here’s an example showing how things work:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 |
class Base { public: int m_public; protected: int m_protected; private: int m_private; }; class Pub: public Base // note: public inheritance { // Public inheritance means: // Public inherited members stay public (so m_public is treated as public) // Protected inherited members stay protected (so m_protected is treated as protected) // Private inherited members stay inaccessible (so m_private is inaccessible) public: Pub() { m_public = 1; // okay: m_public was inherited as public m_protected = 2; // okay: m_protected was inherited as protected m_private = 3; // not okay: m_private is inaccessible from derived class } }; int main() { // Outside access uses the access specifiers of the class being accessed. Base base; base.m_public = 1; // okay: m_public is public in Base base.m_protected = 2; // not okay: m_protected is protected in Base base.m_private = 3; // not okay: m_private is private in Base Pub pub; pub.m_public = 1; // okay: m_public is public in Pub pub.m_protected = 2; // not okay: m_protected is protected in Pub pub.m_private = 3; // not okay: m_private is inaccessible in Pub |
This is the same as the example above where we introduced the protected access specifier, except that we’ve instantiated the derived class as well, just to show that with public inheritance, things work identically in the base and derived class.
Public inheritance is what you should be using unless you have a specific reason not to.
Rule
Use public inheritance unless you have a specific reason to do otherwise.
Protected inheritance
Protected inheritance is the least common method of inheritance. It is almost never used, except in very particular cases. With protected inheritance, the public and protected members become protected, and private members stay inaccessible.
Because this form of inheritance is so rare, we’ll skip the example and just summarize with a table:
Access specifier in base class | Access specifier when inherited protectedly |
---|---|
Public | Protected |
Protected | Protected |
Private | Inaccessible |
Private inheritance
With private inheritance, all members from the base class are inherited as private. This means private members stay private, and protected and public members become private.
Note that this does not affect the way that the derived class accesses members inherited from its parent! It only affects the code trying to access those members through the derived class.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 |
class Base { public: int m_public; protected: int m_protected; private: int m_private; }; class Pri: private Base // note: private inheritance { // Private inheritance means: // Public inherited members become private (so m_public is treated as private) // Protected inherited members become private (so m_protected is treated as private) // Private inherited members stay inaccessible (so m_private is inaccessible) public: Pri() { m_public = 1; // okay: m_public is now private in Pri m_protected = 2; // okay: m_protected is now private in Pri m_private = 3; // not okay: derived classes can't access private members in the base class } }; int main() { // Outside access uses the access specifiers of the class being accessed. // In this case, the access specifiers of base. Base base; base.m_public = 1; // okay: m_public is public in Base base.m_protected = 2; // not okay: m_protected is protected in Base base.m_private = 3; // not okay: m_private is private in Base Pri pri; pri.m_public = 1; // not okay: m_public is now private in Pri pri.m_protected = 2; // not okay: m_protected is now private in Pri pri.m_private = 3; // not okay: m_private is inaccessible in Pri return 0; } |
To summarize in table form:
Access specifier in base class | Access specifier when inherited privately |
---|---|
Public | Private |
Protected | Private |
Private | Inaccessible |
Private inheritance can be useful when the derived class has no obvious relationship to the base class, but uses the base class for implementation internally. In such a case, we probably don’t want the public interface of the base class to be exposed through objects of the derived class (as it would be if we inherited publicly).
In practice, private inheritance is rarely used.
A final example
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 |
class Base { public: int m_public; protected: int m_protected; private: int m_private; }; |
Base can access its own members without restriction. The public can only access m_public. Derived classes can access m_public and m_protected.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 |
class D2 : private Base // note: private inheritance { // Private inheritance means: // Public inherited members become private // Protected inherited members become private // Private inherited members stay inaccessible public: int m_public2; protected: int m_protected2; private: int m_private2; }; |
D2 can access its own members without restriction. D2 can access Base’s m_public and m_protected members, but not m_private. Because D2 inherited Base privately, m_public and m_protected are now considered private when accessed through D2. This means the public can not access these variables when using a D2 object, nor can any classes derived from D2.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 |
class D3 : public D2 { // Public inheritance means: // Public inherited members stay public // Protected inherited members stay protected // Private inherited members stay inaccessible public: int m_public3; protected: int m_protected3; private: int m_private3; }; |
D3 can access its own members without restriction. D3 can access D2’s m_public2 and m_protected2 members, but not m_private2. Because D3 inherited D2 publicly, m_public2 and m_protected2 keep their access specifiers when accessed through D3. D3 has no access to Base’s m_private, which was already private in Base. Nor does it have access to Base’s m_protected or m_public, both of which became private when D2 inherited them.
Summary
The way that the access specifiers, inheritance types, and derived classes interact causes a lot of confusion. To try and clarify things as much as possible:
First, a class (and friends) can always access its own non-inherited members. The access specifiers only affect whether outsiders and derived classes can access those members.
Second, when derived classes inherit members, those members may change access specifiers in the derived class. This does not affect the derived classes’ own (non-inherited) members (which have their own access specifiers). It only affects whether outsiders and classes derived from the derived class can access those inherited members.
Here’s a table of all of the access specifier and inheritance types combinations:
Access specifier in base class | Access specifier when inherited publicly | Access specifier when inherited privately | Access specifier when inherited protectedly |
---|---|---|---|
Public | Public | Private | Protected |
Protected | Protected | Private | Protected |
Private | Inaccessible | Inaccessible | Inaccessible |
As a final note, although in the examples above, we’ve only shown examples using member variables, these access rules hold true for all members (e.g. member functions and types declared inside the class).
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
THX!
Thanks for the last example. It was simple concise, and cleared all my doubts about the subject. Keep up with updating your tutorial!! ^^
Very nice and thorough tutorial, however I found one very misleading point:
For public inheritance, your table says private will become private in the derived class (and you introduce an extra column to say that it is not accessible in the derved class explicitly). This is anything but true, because private will become *inaccessible* in the derived class - not private. Beginners who would take the easy way of learning, would memorize your tables, and they would easily get confused by it.
What you say is:
Public -> Public
Protected -> Protected
Private -> Private
This is how I would change your table, putting a "-" to the appropriate cell:
public -> public
protected -> protected
private -> -
Same applies to protected inheritance:
public -> protected
protected -> protected
private -> -
And for private inheritance:
public -> private
protected -> private
private -> -
So in my interpretation, there is an even easier way to memorize all 3*3 cases:
First, you'd need to point out, that private is private. No matter how you inherit, a private member will NOT be accessible in the derived class.
So here it is how I'd let people memorize it:
0. Inheritance specifier is uninterpretable for private members.
1. PUBLIC inheritance: Everything remains the SAME in the derived class:
public -> public
protected -> protected
2. PROTECTED inheritance: Everything becomes PROTECTED in the derived class:
public -> protected
protected -> protected
3. PRIVATE inheritance: Everything becomes PRIVATE in the derived class:
public -> private
protected -> private
This is how I was taught it, and I think that it is much simpler this way.
Thanks Peter
your comment makes Alex's article more understandable, specially for Beginners, most of the times they become confused at this point, but if they follow your table they never confused LIKE ME :)
Thanks & Regards
Nikhil Singhal
Peter you made it more clear to understand the hierarchy of inheritance .. thanks a lot..
Upon reflection, I agree that this way of looking at things is simpler. I've updated the lesson to follow this pattern.
ITS SUPERB AND THANKS A LOT. IT GIVES A OVER ALL VIEW OF THE ACCESS SPECIFIERS STORY.
THANKS.
Excellent tutorial.
The best I've seen so far.
Helped me a lot.
Thank you!
Thanks!. Good explanation of the topic.
Great explanation - thanks!
Is the first table on Public inheritance correct?
I think all the entries in "derived access specifier" column should be Public.
YES IT IS CORRECT. IF YOU INHERIT PUBLICLY THEN ALL THE BASE SPECIFIERS WILL RETAIN THEIR ACCESS LEVEL IN DERIVED CLASS
Very nice explanation !
Excellent.. amazing simplicity in way of teaching... kudos to you...
Great tutorial. Thanks.
thanks it made the topic more clear
migmar dolma
Thanx a tonne..Beautiful Tutorial..Finally understood what all class specifiers are after 3 yeras of graduation??
Very good explanation done. Thanks.
Really amazing tutorial... I got many-things new here...
thank you very much.....
I have neve seen such a clear definitions and examples before. Thanks Alex!
very nice example
very good example
here u willget complete view of the exact inheritance is
Very informative... some stuff i didnt know...thnaks a lot
excellent tutorial...
Excellent article...
Thanks,
Purushothman J
It's very useful doc for those who are beginner in c++.
so, private and protected inheritance only differ in classes that are derived more than one time (multiple inheritance), it's that right?
I suppose you could look at it that way. Really the derived class does differ, since members will have different access specifiers. However, as you imply, since private and protected have the same access restrictions within a class, there's no practical difference until you derive the class again.
Just so you know, the term multiple inheritance should not be used when referring to a class that has been derived multiple times. It has a different meaning: a class that is derived from multiple parents simultaneously. We cover multiple inheritance in a few more lessons.
In the first example under the title "Public inheritance" the Pub constructor should be public. Apart from that, great tutorial (judging from what i've seen until now).
Ben
Good catch, the code will not compile because the examples clearly state "not ok ...", which in case will give compiler errors. If those examples are commented out, it is true, you will still get an error since the Pub default constructor is private by default.
"judging from what i've seen until now" - I'd like to see you try to judge it on the stuff you hadn't seen up till then. :P
Fixed.
Very clear, thanks a lot!
Amazing Tutorials. No more words.
I have been working as Software engineer of Real Time Embedded for 7 years and I discovered that there is many things I never knew.
Thank you
Wael
very comprehensive tutorial.. kudos to you!!