3.8 — Using an integrated debugger: Watching variables

In the previous lessons (3.6 -- Using an integrated debugger: Stepping and 3.7 -- Using an integrated debugger: Running and breakpoints), you learned how to use the debugger to watch the path of execution through your program. However, stepping through a program is only half of what makes the debugger useful. The debugger also lets you examine the value of variables as you step through your code, all without having to modify your code.

As per previous lessons, our examples here will use Visual Studio -- if you are using a different IDE/debugger, the commands may have slightly different names or be located in different locations.


In case you are returning, make sure your project is compiled using a debug build configuration (see 0.9 -- Configuring your compiler: Build configurations for more information). If you’re compiling your project using a release configuration instead, the functionality of the debugger may not work correctly.

Watching variables

Watching a variable is the process of inspecting the value of a variable while the program is executing in debug mode. Most debuggers provide several ways to do this.

Let’s take a look at a sample program:

This is a pretty straightforward sample program -- it prints the numbers 1, 3, and 6.

First, run to cursor to line 6.

At this point, the variable x has already been created and initialized with the value 1, so when we examine the value of x, we should expect to see the value 1.

The easiest way to examine the value of a simple variable like x is to hover your mouse over the variable x. Some modern debuggers support this method of inspecting simple variables, and it is the most straightforward way to do so.

For Code::Blocks users

If you’re using Code::Blocks, this option is (inexplicably) off by default. Let’s turn it on. First, go to Settings menu > Debugger…. Then under the GDB/CDB debugger node, select the Default profile. Finally, check the box labeled Evaluate expression under cursor.

Hover your mouse cursor over variable x on line 6, and you should see something like this:

Note that you can hover over any variable x, not just the one on the current line. For example, if we hover over the x on line 12, we’ll see the same value:

If you’re using Visual Studio, you can also use QuickWatch. Highlight the variable name x with your mouse, and then choose “QuickWatch” from the right-click menu.

This will pull up a subwindow containing the current value of the variable:

Go ahead and close QuickWatch if you opened it.

Now let’s watch this variable change as we step through the program. Either choose step over twice, or run to cursor to line 9. The variable x should now have value 3. Inspect it and make sure that it does!

The watch window

Using the mouse hover or QuickWatch methods to inspect variables is fine if you want to know the value of a variable at a particular point in time, but it’s not particularly well suited to watching the value of a variable change as you run the code because you continually have to rehover/reselect the variable.

In order to address this issue, all modern integrated debuggers provide another feature, called a watch window. The watch window is a window where you can add variables you would like to continually inspect, and these variables will be updated as you step through your program. The watch window may already be on your screen when you enter debug mode, but if it is not, you can bring it up through your IDE’s window commands (these are typically found in a View or Debug menu).

For Visual Studio users

In Visual Studio, the watch menu can be found at Debug menu > Windows > Watch > Watch 1. Do note that you have to be in debug mode for this option to be enabled, so step into your program first.

Where this window appears (docked left, right, or bottom) may vary. You can change where it is docked by dragging the Watch 1 tab to a different side of the application window.

For Code::Blocks users

In Code::Blocks, the watch menu can be found at Debug menu > Debugging windows > Watches. This window will likely appear as a separate window. You can dock it into your main window by dragging it over.

You should now see something like this:

The watches window may or may not contain anything in it already.

There are typically two different ways to add variables to the watch window:

  1. Pull up the watch window, and type in the name of the variable you would like to watch in the leftmost column of the watch window.
  2. In the code window, right click on the variable you’d like to watch, and choose Add Watch (Visual Studio) or Watch x (replace x with the variable’s name) (Code::Blocks).

If you’re not already in a debugging session with the execution marker on line 9 of your program, start a new debugging session and run to cursor to line 9.

Now, go ahead and add the variable “x” to your watch list. You should now see this:

Now step over twice, or run to cursor to line 12, and you should see the value of x change from 3 to 6.

Variables that go out of scope (e.g. a local variable inside a function that has already returned to the caller) will stay in your watch window, but will generally either be marked as “not available”, or may show the last known value but grayed out. If the variable returns to scope (e.g. the function is called again), its value will begin showing again. Therefore, it’s fine to leave variables in the watch window, even if they’re out of scope.

Using watches is the best way to watch the value of a variable change over time as you step through your program.

The watch window can evaluate expressions too

The watch window will also allow you to evaluate simple expressions. If you haven’t already, run to cursor to line 12. Then try entering x + 2 into the watch window and see what happens (it should evaluate to 8).

You can also highlight an expression in your code and then inspect the value of that expression via hover or by adding it to the watch window via the right-click context menu.


Identifiers in watched expressions will evaluate to their current values. If you want to know what value an expression in your code is actually evaluating to, run to cursor to it first, so that all identifiers have the correct values.

Local watches

Because inspecting the value of local variables inside a function is common while debugging, many debuggers will offer some way to quickly watch the value of all local variables in scope.

For Visual Studio users

In Visual Studio, you can see the value of all local variables in the Locals window, which can be found at Debug menu > Windows > Locals. Note that you have to be in a debug session to activate this window.

For Code::Blocks users

In Code::Blocks, this is integrated into the Watch window, under the Locals node. If you don’t see any, there either aren’t any, or you need to uncollapse the node.

If you’re just looking to watch the value of a local variable, check the locals window first. It should already be there.

3.9 -- Using an integrated debugger: The call stack
3.7 -- Using an integrated debugger: Running and breakpoints

112 comments to 3.8 — Using an integrated debugger: Watching variables

  • When i press Step Over it jumps to some other format of code instead of my code. Please help!!

  • J34NP3T3R

    cant find "Watch" in Debug >> Windows >>

    i just have

    Exceptions Settings
    Show Diagnostic Tools

  • tran duc phong

    hi ale.when I finish running your debugging directions my program crashes and rerun the old code even though I changed the new code it only shows the old code although the new command I wrote incorrectly it still runs.when I run the code normally by command crel+f5;
    [#include <iostream>

    int main()
        int x{ 1 };
        std::cout << x << " ";

        x = x + 2;
        std::cout << x << " ";

        x = x + 3;
        std::cout << x << " ";;//the syntax is wrong but it gives no error and still shows the result of old code. how to fix it?

        return 0;
    the code still runs when the syntax is wrong. i know it's running old code not new code

  • sam p

    Exceptionally useful stuff. Many Thanks.

    (In the last section, Local watches, in the advice to Visual Studio users, there's a small typo:

    ... which can be found at at Debug menu > Windows > Locals

    (The word 'at' is duplicated.) )

  • ryan fritz

    Why can't i watch a global varible in Code::blocks?
    i tried to "run the cursor" to a varible defined outside main function but it didn't work i also tried the samething inside but in there's no global varible in the watch coloumn.

  • Blair

    This lesson asserts:

    >>The watch window can evaluate expressions too

    >>The watch window will also allow you to evaluate simple expressions. If you haven’t already, run to cursor to line 12. Then try >>entering x + 2 into the watch window and see what happens (it should evaluate to 8).

    Is this ever useful? The given example doesn't seem particularly useful but I imagine there is a reason we are shown this functionality. What is it?

    • TomCruise

      Of course, it is useful. In case you got an output value that you didn't expect. Watch window is handy to analyze how did you get the wrong value.

  • BeanSprugget

    I'm surprised I/we didn't encounter an example of assignment earlier: I thought assignment, after you introduced brace initialization and denounced the other two kinds of initialization, was supposed to be done with braces rather than copy assignment. I guess, I think you need to make that clearer (earlier in the lessons).

  • sami(Warning)

    I have read this part several time, I still don't get it and what it should be in the "warning" part?

    • cae

      It warns you to run to cursor to it first so that you know the program is actually at the state you want to check the value.  Earlier or later in the program the variable may have a different value.

  • HolzstockG

    Why after stepping "return" statement do we still have to go through function's ending curly brace? I am really curious about that. Shouldn't function just close after return? I did try to put some lines of code under return and as it should it did avoid them but not curly brace.

    • Alex

      I'm not totally sure, but my guess is that post-function cleanup is happening at this point (e.g. popping the frame off the call stack). It would make sense to have all this code at one place (at the end of the function) rather than associated with each potential return point.

  • Bruno


    I think code blocks is getting to close to Visual Studios at the end of this lesson(Local watches). XD. Naughty code blocks.

  • Joe

    Hi, just some nitpicking.

    Near the end of section Watching variables, it says to "step over 3 times" in order to get to line9 when in fact only 2 step overs are needed.

    Edit: similar thing occurs under The watch window. Says "step over 3 times" when only two are needed

    In the examples, we were asked to move exactly 3 lines down hence why we were asked to step over 3 times. However, between the statements is a blank line so only 2 steps really are needed

    Anyway, really appreciate the guide :D

  • Len

    Just leaving a quick suggestions:

    In Visual Studios Community 2017 the option to show the Locals window in Debug > Windows > Locals is only available when you are currently in a debug session. In the next tutorial you mention this for the call stack but here you do not. You might consider adding that in to avoid someone being confused.

  • AA

    Hi there,
    Thanks you all for publishing these awesome tutorials. I'd love them.
    I recommend to you that add Qt Creator in them, Because it's really greater than Code::Blocks and you know it's cross-platform.

    I have a problem about initializing the variable 'x'.
    As I said I use Qt Creator 5.7 on Mint(GNU/Linux), but when I'm using "Run to cursor" command to debug first

    , the value X is initialized with the value 0 !.
    What's the matter ?
    I know there are differences between compilers but in this case I don't know anymore !
    Thank you so much ;)

  • YK

    Hi Alex,

    Thank you so much for putting this tutorials out. They are awesome!
    I know it takes a lot of time and thoughts to put all this information together.
    And it's not about just putting the information out, but putting it out in a manner so that it's easy to understand.
    Your concise explanation supported with examples makes it very easy to follow along.
    Thanks again for taking time to spread the knowledge!

  • Thank you for this blog..This is really very helpful for me as I am preparing for courses in Development..I used to prefer your blog since long time for keeping me updates..looking forward for new blogs..

  • Derick

    Just want to check whether I missed something or it hasn't been covered.

    In the first block of example code x is initialized with the line

    But in all the subsequent versions of the same program it's shown as

    Is this a different syntax for declaring and initializing a variable, or is this something visual studio does during debuging mode? I don't recall it being in any of the earlier tutorials.

  • Lazar

    Hi Alex :) Just wanted to let you know before the call stack window headline you wrote now chose, it should be now choose.

  • Nick Boots

    I'm a bit confused by the differing call stack output. You mentioned the outputs can differ, but they point at quite the different positions in the example above and in my program.

    Both my Script and the one in the example match in line numbers. With mine being done in VS 2017 Pro.

    In yours Main and CallA() are marked at the line after the closing bracket, in mine a line after each Function that performs the call. (Line 25 and 18 respectively.) Finally, the last two calls are on line 13 for CallB() and line 5 for CallC() for me.

    I'm a bit confused as to why it differs so much and would like to understand it, did something change?

  • Virgi

    Hi Alex,
    I would like to know why when I put a breakpoint in codeblocks and run debug it doesn't stop there, it runs all the way through the program and ends with "Debugger finished with status 0"
    Thank you so much for teaching us cpp!

    • Alex

      Are you sure the breakpoint is actually being hit? If the code never executes the line that is breakpointed, the breakpoint won't trigger.

    • Jack

      In case anyone still has this problem....I had it using code::blocks, ie not stopping at breakpoints (although it was possible to step through the code with 'step into') After spending a day trying various ideas I found I had been too profligate  in my naming of the project directory -- using too many spaces and non-ascii characters. Changing to simpler file names cured it. I subsequently found this post.

  • Louis Cloete

    error line [below 2nd screenshot of watch window]: present tense verb "choose" expected, past tense verb "chose" found ;-)

  • himanshu

    Hi Alex!
    I unable to understand what call stack try to say
    I am using code::block
    It is completely different than your's call stack
    and unfortunately i unable to copy it so i can not paste it but the first line is:

    0x4010fd _mingw_CRTSartup()

  • Audrius

    Is there any way to watch array values inside a function like this one?

    Thanks, keep up the good work :)

  • William


    I'm not sure If I understand what the difference between "run to cursor" and breakpoints exactly is. Both execute code until you hit that one specific line, no? With the "run to cursor" command, you can then continue to debug your code. However with a breakpoint, the program just stops executing and closes? Is this correctly understood?

    • Alex

      A breakpoint is a pre-set spot where the debugger will always stop the code from executing. Run to cursor is essentially the same as setting a breakpoint, choosing run, and then removing the breakpoint you just set when any breakpoint is hit. Breakpoint are typically placed in places where you always want to stop. Run to cursor is used when you want to go to a particular spot once.

  • My dear c++ Teacher,
    Could you please add some instructions for code::blocks users?
    With regards and friendship.

  • Mick

    Hey Alex,

    This could be me doing something incredible stupid but my program won't build. I get an error: 'x': redefinition, multiple initialization every time x is mentioned in the code.

    Thanks in advance!

    • Alex

      This is an easy one. You only need to tell the compiler that x is an int the first time you define x. After that, you just use x. e.g. "x = x + 1" instead of "int x = x + 1".

  • Nakul

    Hey Alex.
    You said in this that VS takes you to the next line after the function call.What does that mean and how to do it?
    Plus when i press Step Over it jumps to some other format of code instead of my code. Pls help

    • Alex

      So consider these two lines of code:

      If your cursor is on the someFunction line, and you step over the function, the someFunction() function will execute, and the program will stop just before x = y executes.

      I'm not sure why Step Over is jumping you to another bit of code. What function and/or file is this code in?

Leave a Comment

Put all code inside code tags: [code]your code here[/code]