2.8 — Literals

C++ has two kinds of constants: literal, and symbolic. In this lesson, we’ll cover literals.

Literal constants

Literal constants (usually just called “literals”) are values inserted directly into the code. They are constants because you can’t change their values. For example:

While boolean and integer literals are pretty straightforward, there are two different ways to declare floating-point literals:

In the second form, the number after the exponent can be negative:

Numeric literals can have suffixes that determine their types. These suffixes are optional, as the compiler can usually tell from context what kind of constant you’re intending.

Data Type Suffix Meaning
int u or U unsigned int
int l or L long
int ul, uL, Ul, UL, lu, lU, Lu, or LU unsigned long
int ll or LL long long
int ull, uLL, Ull, ULL, llu, llU, LLu, or LLU unsigned long long
double f or F float
double l or L long double

You probably won’t need to use suffixes for integer types, but here are examples:

By default, floating point literal constants have a type of double. To convert them into a float value, the f or F suffix can be used:

C++ also supports char and string literals:

Char literals work just like you’d expect. However, string literals are handled very strangely in C++. For now, it’s fine to use string literals to print text with std::cout, but don’t try and assign them to variables or pass them to functions -- it either won’t work, or won’t work like you’d expect. We’ll talk more about C-style strings (and how to work around all of those odd issues) in future lessons.

Literals are fine to use in C++ code so long as their meanings are clear. This is most often the case when used to assign a value to a variable, do math, or print some text to the screen.

Octal and hexadecimal literals

In everyday life, we count using decimal numbers, where each numerical digit can be 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, or 9. Decimal is also called “base 10”, because there are 10 possible digits (0 through 9). In this system, we count like this: 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, … By default, numbers in C++ programs are assumed to be decimal.

In binary, there are only 2 digits: 0 and 1, so it is called “base 2”. In binary, we count like this: 0, 1, 10, 11, 100, 101, 110, 111, …

There are two other “bases” that are sometimes used in computing: octal, and hexadecimal.

Octal is base 8 -- that is, the only digits available are: 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7. In Octal, we count like this: 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 10, 11, 12, … (note: no 8 and 9, so we skip from 7 to 10).

Decimal 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Octal 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 10 11 12 13

To use an octal literal, prefix your literal with a 0:

This program prints:


Why 10 instead of 12? Because numbers are printed in decimal, and 12 octal = 10 decimal.

Octal is hardly ever used, and we recommend you avoid it.

Hexadecimal is base 16. In hexadecimal, we count like this: 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, A, B, C, D, E, F, 10, 11, 12, …

Decimal 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
Hexadecimal 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 A B C D E F 10 11

To use a hexadecimal literal, prefix your literal with 0x.

This program prints:


Because there are 16 different values for a hexadecimal digit, we can say that a single hexadecimal digit encompasses 4 bits. Consequently, a pair of hexadecimal digits can be used to exactly represent a full byte.

Consider a 32-bit integer with value 0011 1010 0111 1111 1001 1000 0010 0110. Because of the length and repetition of digits, that’s not easy to read. In hexadecimal, this same value would be: 3A7F 9826. This makes hexadecimal values useful as a concise way to represent a value in memory. For this reason, hexadecimal values are often used to represent memory addresses or raw values in memory.

Prior to C++14, there is no way to assign a binary literal. However, hexadecimal pairs provides us with an useful workaround:

C++14 binary literals and digit separators

In C++14, we can assign binary literals by using the 0b prefix:

Because long literals can be hard to read, C++14 also adds the ability to use a quotation mark (‘) as a digit separator.

If your compiler isn’t C++14 compatible, your compiler will complain if you try to use either of these.

Magic numbers, and why they are bad

Consider the following snippet:

A number such as the 30 in the snippet above is called a magic number. A magic number is a hard-coded literal (usually a number) in the middle of the code that does not have any context. What does 30 mean? Although you can probably guess that in this case it’s the maximum number of students per class, it’s not absolutely clear. In more complex programs, it can be very difficult to infer what a hard-coded number represents, unless there’s a comment to explain it.

Using magic numbers is generally considered bad practice because, in addition to not providing context as to what they are being used for, they pose problems if the value needs to change. Let’s assume that the school buys new desks that allow them to raise the class size from 30 to 35, and our program needs to reflect that. Consider the following program:

To update our program to use the new classroom size, we’d have to update the constant 30 to 35. But what about the call to setMax()? Does that 30 have the same meaning as the other 30? If so, it should be updated. If not, it should be left alone, or we might break our program somewhere else. If you do a global search-and-replace, you might inadvertently update the argument of setMax() when it wasn’t supposed to change. So you have to look through all the code for every instance of the literal 30, and then determine whether it needs to change or not. That can be seriously time consuming (and error prone).

Fortunately, better options (symbolic constants) exist. We’ll talk about those in the next lesson.

Rule: Don’t use magic numbers in your code.

2.9 -- Const, constexpr, and symbolic constants
2.7 -- Chars

51 comments to 2.8 — Literals

  • Literal constants are literal numbers inserted into the code. They are constants because you can’t change their values.

    int x = 5; // 5 is a literal constant

    I don’t understand this, you can change 5 to 6, how is it unchangable?

    • If you use the number 6 instead of 5, you are using a different literal, not changing the value of a literal. In other words, literals are constants because the symbol 5 always has the value 5. You can’t change the symbol 5 to the value 6, or any other number.

    • Elpidius

      When declaring an integer variable that isn’t const, the value of the variable x can be reassigned to, later on.

      int x = 5; // declares x as an integer variable and assigns 5 to x
      x = 2; // 2 is now assigned to x, instead of 5
      x = 4; // 4 is now assigned to x, instead of 2

      In the above example, x is declared and the number 5 is assigned to x. We can then assign another number to x later on, which will then change the value of x.

      We can check that the values have changed by printing them to the console:

      using namespace std;
      int x = 5;
      cout << x << endl; // the value of x displayed here is 5
      x = 2;
      cout << x << endl; // the value changes to 2
      x = 4;
      cout << x << endl; // now it is 4

      This outputs:

      However when we declare a variable as const, and assign a value to it, we cannot assign another value later on:

      const int x = 5; // declares x as an constant integer variable and assigns 5 to x
      x = 2; // compiler error, as we cannot assign another value to x

      Although the compiler comes up with an error “you cannot assign to a variable that is const”, this is misleading, as you can assign (initialize) a literal constant to a variable only once. Consequently its value remains constant throughout the entire program.

      P.S. I’m also a newbie learning C++, but I’m just getting this logic from what Alex has written in the past, along with some practise on Visual C++ 2010 Express!

      P.P.S. I’m loving these tutorials Alex 😉

  • Alex:

    Ref.: it is a good idea to try to avoid using literal constants that aren’t 0 or 1.

    So I should use only literal constants that are 0 or 1? As for above.

  • pravin

    this is very nice tutorial..
    i m not new to c++ also not proficient but getting good concepts from this tutorial

  • Hi Alex,
    I’m new to c++. My question may be dump to you but what’s the difference between “int = 5” or “int == 5”.

    • dospy

      there is no such thing like “int = 5” or “int == 5?
      “int” is a keyword used to define variables type

  • linuxx

    Hi! I’m not totally new to C++, but new to this course. (Yes, I’m calling it a “course” ’cause it’s better than all other C++ teaching I’ve come across in the past - THANK YOU SO MUCH!)

    Anyhow… I’ve been digging through the tutorials very seriously. All of the stuff is really well explained and if a piece of information happens to be missing, it is usually covered by the comments. However, here (in 2.8), I’m a bit lost… Can you explain to me, why we’d want to add an “L” to

    long nValue2 = 5L;

    or an f to

    float fValue = 5.0f;


    They have already been declared as being “long” and “float”… So what’s the point here…???


    • Alex

      There aren’t a whole lot of reasons you’d need to specify the L prefix.

      But lets say you had two functions:
      void doSomething(int);
      void doSomething(long);

      if you called doSomething(5), you’d get the int version instead of the long version. Using doSomething(5L) would get you version that takes the long parameter.

      There are probably other obscure examples.

      The f prefix is used more commonly, because floating point numbers have weird truncation/rounding issues.

      Consider the following code:

      This prints “not equal”! Why? When 0.67 gets assigned to f, it gets truncated to 0.670000017. When you compare that truncated value to the double value 0.67, it doesn’t match!

      This one works as expected:

  • PaulS

    Above you have: Octal is base 8 — that is, the only digits available are: 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8.

    That would be base 9, though, right?

  • The last example seems to have wrong comments:

    should be:

    Thanks for the tutorial !

  • Kanchana

    I think you made a typo here

    above code should be


  • Steve

    A good thing to have in mind counting in oct and hex:
    oct is base 8, so starting the count is 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
    all 8 digits were used, so now we add 1 to the left: 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17
    20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27 etc.
    same for hex, base 16:
    0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, A, B, C, D, E, F
    add 1 left:
    10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 1A, 1B, 1C, 1D, 1E, 1F
    this principle is for decimal as well, just an easy way to count…

  • gigi

    Hi Alex
    Can you add ";" to your examples?

  • Yujian

    A question: why FF in hexadecimal is 255 in decimal?

    • Alejandro

      That’s simple hexa coding, you definitely should re-read about it.

      "F" in hexa stands for a "15" in decimal (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E,F), so when you have 0xFF to convert it to decimal:
      0xFF = F * 16^1 + F * 16^0 = 15 * 16 + 15 = 240 + 15 = 255.


  • Aryan

    HI there Alex,

    I am a bit confused as to why one needs to type in the suffixes of the data types? They are not necessary right?

    • Alex

      The suffixes of the data types tell C++ how to interpret a literal.

      For example, if you type in 5.2, C++ knows this is a floating point literal, but it doesn’t know whether you meant a float or a double. So it assumes double.

      If you wanted/needed 5.2 to be a float, you’re better off specifying the literal as 5.2f, so C++ knows you meant a float, not a double.

      Otherwise, if you do this:

      C++ will convert 5.2 from a double to a float before assigning to variable f, and you may lose some precision.

      Suffixes are only needed if the default type for a literal isn’t sufficient for your needs. Generally, when using literals, it’s a good idea to ensure your literal has the same type as the variable it’s being assigned to, to minimize the chance of something unexpectedly going wrong somewhere.

  • Roee Sefi

    Why 10 instead of 12? Because numbers are stored in decimal, and 12 octal = 10 decimal.

    I think it should be:
    Because numbers are being printed in… (or something)
    They actually stored in binary.

  • TheSuitIsNotBlack

    I’m confused about the float type default of double. Why isn’t the default of float set to float? It seems weird to have to use a suffix to specify that the type should be float for a type that’s already been defined as float. Where does the double come in?

    • Alex

      Are you asking why for the following:

      4.0 isn’t assumed to be a float since it’s assigned to a float variable? I presume because:
      * C doesn’t have type inference (C++11 does, but this was inherited from C).
      * Type inference works from right to left, not left to right.
      * This gives the programmer has explicit control over what 4.0 means (type double) regardless of what’s on the left-hand side of the literal.

  • crazyD

    alex, thx for all these best tuts. i want to ask u, are u now going to write tuts for some other platforms also or not??….it will be best for me if u will write javaEE.

  • Bill

    Your syntax highlighter certainly makes a mess of the infix apostrophes in binary literals…I guess it’s not C++14 compliant 🙂

  • Oeleo

    I don’t really understand the definition of litteral, because in math I found this definition :
    "Literal numbers are the letters which are used to represent a number."
    But here it seems to have a totally different signification, but which ?

  • Oeleo

    Hello, I tried to do a converter decimal/hexadecimal or decimal/octal with his code :

    But it seems that using 0x01 and 0number doesn’t work if you write it in the consol. Is their any way to create a converter like that ?

  • Maxwell Pollack

    I’m CLICKING ON EVERY AD!  You’re welcome.

  • Nyap

    does gcc support C++14?

    • Alex

      Yes, some newer versions do. But you have to pass it a flag to enable that functionality (-std=c++14 or -std=c++1y, depending on gcc version)

  • bert

    I believe you meant to use "ways" in the following line:

    While boolean and integer literals are pretty straightforward, there are two different way to declare floating-point literals:

    thanks - appreciate all your hard work!

  • Nguyen

    Hi Alex,

    There are many vital pieces of information about "Binary" in section 2.1 & 2.3 (… all data on a computer is just a sequence of bits…..When you assign a value to a data type, the compiler and CPU take care of the details of encoding your value into the appropriate sequence of bits for that data type. When you ask for your value back, your number is “reconstituted” from the sequence of bits in memory….)

    In this section, Octal and Hexadecimal are introduced…but I don’t know what they are for?

    Thanks, Have a nice day.

    • Alex

      As I mention in the lesson, octal is hardly ever used, so you can basically forget about it.

      Hexadecimal values are used a lot though, mainly because two hexadecimal values cover 8 bits, which is a byte. Therefore, when we talk about the contents of a memory address (which are a byte), instead of representing those contents as 8 binary digits, it’s much easier to represent them as 2 hexadecimal digits.

  • Matt

    Typo towards the end of section "Literal constants":
    "By default, floating point literal constant have a type of double."

    "Constant" should be plural.

  • Philip

    In the code fragment on hexidecimal below

    on line 15

    you have the incorrect binary value for B. it should be 1011 not 1010

Leave a Comment

Put C++ code inside [code][/code] tags to use the syntax highlighter