Search

3.5 — More debugging tactics

In the previous lesson (3.4 -- Basic debugging tactics), we started exploring how to manually debug problems. In that lesson, we offered some criticisms of using statements to print debug text:

  1. Debug statements clutter your code.
  2. Debug statements clutter the output of your program.
  3. Debug statements require modification of your code to both add and to remove, which can introduce new bugs.
  4. Debug statements must be removed after you’re done with them, which makes them non-reusable.

We can mitigate some of these issues. In this lesson, we’ll explore some basic techniques for doing so.

Conditionalizing your debugging code

Consider the following program that contains some debug statements:

When you’re done with the debugging statement, you’ll either need to remove them, or comment them out. Then if you want them again later, you’ll have to add them back, or uncomment them.

One way to make it easier to disable and enable debugging throughout your program is to make your debugging statements conditional using preprocessor directives:

Now we can enable debugging simply by commenting / uncommenting #define ENABLE_DEBUG. This allows us to reuse previously added debug statements and then just disable them when we’re done with them, rather than having to actually remove them from the code. If this were a multi-file program, the #define ENABLE_DEBUG would go in a header file that’s included into all code files so we can comment / uncomment the #define in a single location and have it propagate to all code files.

This addresses the issue with having to remove debug statements and the risk in doing so, but at the cost of even more code clutter. Another downside of this approach is that if you make a typo (e.g. misspell “DEBUG”) or forget to include the header into a code file, some or all of the debugging for that file may not be enabled. So although this is better than the unconditionalized version, there’s still room to improve.

Using a logger

An alternative approach to conditionalized debugging via the preprocessor is to send your debugging information to a log file. A log file is a file (normally stored on disk) that records events that occur in software. The process of writing information to a log file is called logging. Most applications and operating systems write log files that can be used to help diagnose issues that occur.

Log files have a few advantages. Because the information written to a log file is separated from your program’s output, you can avoid the clutter caused by mingling your normal output and debug output. Log files can also be easily sent to other people for diagnosis -- so if someone using your software has an issue, you can ask them to send you the log file, and it might help give you a clue where the issue is.

While you can write your own code to create log file and send output to them, you’re better off using one of the many existing third-party logging tools available. Which one you use is up to you.

For illustrative purposes, we’ll show what outputting to a logger looks like using the plog logger. Plog is implemented as a set of header files, so it’s easy to include anywhere you need it, and it’s lightweight and easy to use.

Here’s output from the above logger (in the Logfile.txt file):

2018-12-26 20:03:33.295 DEBUG [4752] [main@14] main() called
2018-12-26 20:03:33.296 DEBUG [4752] [getUserInput@4] getUserInput() called

How you include, initialize, and use a logger will vary depending on the specific logger you select.

Note that conditional compilation directives are also not required using this method, as most loggers have a method to reduce/eliminate writing output to the log. This makes the code a lot easier to read, as the conditional compilation lines add a lot of clutter. With plog, logging can be temporarily disabled by changing the init statement to the following:

We won’t use plog in any future lessons, so you don’t need to worry about learning it.

As an aside...

If you want to compile the above example yourself, or use plog in your own projects, you can follow these instructions to install it:

First, get the latest plog release:

  • Visit the plog repo.
  • Click the “releases” tab (it’s in the same row as “commits”, “branches”, “packages”, etc…)
  • Under the release tagged as “latest release” on the left, click the link “Source code (zip)” to download the latest release.

Next, unzip the entire archive to <anywhere> on your hard drive.

Finally, for each project, set the <anywhere>\plog-<version>\include\ directory as an include directory inside your IDE. There are instructions on how to do this for Visual Studio here: A.2 -- Using libraries with Visual Studio and Code::Blocks here: A.3 -- Using libraries with Code::Blocks.


3.6 -- Using an integrated debugger: Stepping
Index
3.4 -- Basic debugging tactics

58 comments to 3.5 — More debugging tactics

  • Chris Kakonkwe

    In what directory may I find the log file written by plog? I can't find it the directory from which I ran the executable.

  • Marcel

    In chapter 2.11 you wrote
    "Use angled brackets to include header files that come with the compiler. Use double quotes to include any other header files."
    Shouldn't you include plog with double quotes then, rather than the angled brackets you're using in the example? Does it even matter if both versions work?

    • Alex

      I updated lesson 2.11 to make it more clear what angled brackes vs double quotes do for #includes.

      You'd use double quotes if you installed plog relative to your source code directory. But since this lesson suggest installing it elsewhere and updating your include paths, using angled brackets is more correct.

  • J34NP3T3R

    do LOG statements remain within your code permanently ?
    or is it only added when debugging and removed before compiling the finished product.

  • Ali

    Just for anyone, who is having trouble to run plog recently, the main reason is that the recent version (as of May 11) doesn't include the plog::init() (for IDK reasons) I saw that as one of the github issues, and you can either wait, as the author said he will fix it, or basically, download an older version of it. (I tried the previous release and it worked)

  • yeokaiwei

    Can we use #include <Msplog.h> instead?

    It was the recommended version popup in Visual Studio.

Leave a Comment

Put all code inside code tags: [code]your code here[/code]